She is a judge responsible for making decisions about other people's morality yet she had sexual explict photos of herself posted on a porn site. The female judge, Lori Douglas is claiming innocence in the affair. She blames her husband, lawyer Jack King for posting the photos online without her knowledge. My question is, did her husband Jack King hold a gun to her head and force her to pose for explicit and nude photos that were posted on Dark Carvern porn site?
It almost appears as though the victim Alex Chapman, who spilled the beans, is seen as the bad guy in the torrid affair. Chapman claims that Jack King harrassed him by sending him nude photos of his wife and badgering him to have sex with her. He didn't and even though he received hush money to keep quiet, he broke his silence years later.
During the hearing, much attention is focused on King's character but does it really matter in this case when nude photos of the judge are being viewed by the court as evidence. There is no excuse for a judge who behaves in this way. The danger is that if a crimminal she was trying had found out about the naked pictures online, she could have been blackmailed to set a crimminal free.
My fear is that this judge will be made to look like the victim and be back on the bench again handing down justice.
